tokevenGPT 5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 5.6 Terra
Mid-tierGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Fast / BudgetQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use GPT 5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Choose GPT 5.6 Terra when...
- -You need strong summarization (confidence 92 vs 79)
- -You need strong q&a (confidence 92 vs 78)
- -You need strong extraction (confidence 90 vs 83)
- -You need strong classification (confidence 89 vs 85)
- -You need a larger context window (1,050K vs 1,000K)
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when...
- -Cost matters: 85% cheaper on input tokens
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use GPT 5.6 Terra instead of Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
GPT 5.6 Terra outperforms Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for Summarization, Q&A, Extraction. It costs $2.00/$12.00 per million tokens (input/output).
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than GPT 5.6 Terra?
Yes. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite input costs $0.30/MTok vs $2.00/MTok for GPT 5.6 Terra, saving 85% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 5.6 Terra and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
GPT 5.6 Terra has a 1,050K token context window. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a 1,000K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 5.6 Terra and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.