tokevenClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Mid-tierGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Fast / BudgetQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when...
- -You need strong code review (confidence 95 vs 52)
- -You need strong q&a (confidence 88 vs 78)
- -You need strong reasoning (confidence 85 vs 60)
- -You need strong extraction (confidence 71 vs 69)
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when...
- -You need strong classification (confidence 85 vs 84)
- -You need strong summarization (confidence 67 vs 61)
- -You need strong code generation (confidence 58 vs 57)
- -Cost matters: 90% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1.0M vs 1M)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 instead of Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for Code Review, Q&A, Extraction. It costs $3.00/$15.00 per million tokens (input/output).
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Yes. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite input costs $0.30/MTok vs $3.00/MTok for Claude Sonnet 4.6, saving 90% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1M token context window. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a 1.0M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.