tokevenClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Haiku 4.5
Fast / BudgetGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Fast / BudgetQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when...
- -You need strong classification (confidence 90 vs 85)
- -You need strong extraction (confidence 88 vs 83)
- -You need strong q&a (confidence 86 vs 78)
- -You need strong summarization (confidence 82 vs 79)
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when...
- -Cost matters: 70% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,000K vs 200K)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use Claude Haiku 4.5 instead of Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for Classification, Extraction, Q&A. It costs $1.00/$5.00 per million tokens (input/output).
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5?
Yes. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite input costs $0.30/MTok vs $1.00/MTok for Claude Haiku 4.5, saving 70% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a 1,000K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.