tokevenClaude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Opus 4.8
FlagshipGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Fast / BudgetQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Choose Claude Opus 4.8 when...
- -You need strong reasoning (confidence 97 vs 50)
- -You need strong code generation (confidence 95 vs 55)
- -You need strong code review (confidence 94 vs 52)
- -You need strong creative writing (confidence 93 vs 45)
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when...
- -You need strong classification (confidence 85 vs 80)
- -You need strong extraction (confidence 83 vs 82)
- -Cost matters: 94% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,000K vs 200K)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use Claude Opus 4.8 instead of Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
Claude Opus 4.8 outperforms Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for Reasoning, Code Generation, Code Review. It costs $5.00/$25.00 per million tokens (input/output).
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8?
Yes. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite input costs $0.30/MTok vs $5.00/MTok for Claude Opus 4.8, saving 94% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?
Claude Opus 4.8 has a 200K token context window. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a 1,000K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.