GPT · Flagship · 1,050K context window

GPT 5.5 pricing for email summarization

$0.0300 per call at 3,000 input / 500 output tokens.

Per call

$0.0300

10K calls/mo

$300

Cache savings

90% off input

Batch savings

50% off all

Calculate your GPT 5.5 costs

Adjust token counts, volume, and discount toggles to model your email summarization spend. Prices verified daily against provider pricing pages.

Configure your usage

3,000
100100K
500
5050K
10,000
1001M

Estimated cost

Monthly cost
$300
10,000 calls/month
Cost per call$0.03
Daily cost$10
Input rate$5.00/MTok
Output rate$30.00/MTok
Analyze your real spend

Quick start

Call GPT 5.5 with the OpenAI Python SDK:

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-5.5",
    max_tokens=500,
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your prompt here"}]
)
# Cost: ~$0.0300 per call at standard rates
# Input:  $5.00/MTok
# Output: $30.00/MTok

How GPT 5.5 compares on cost

Per-call cost for all models scoring 50+ on email summarization benchmarks. Hover for details.

Cheapest viable option: GPT 5.6 Luna at $0.001200/call (96% less, 84/100 quality).

What drives email summarization cost

Individually cheap, collectively expensive. A single thread is small, but summarization runs across an inbox at volume, so per-call price multiplied by message count is the number that matters, not the cost of any one summary. This is the use case where a fast-tier model and batch processing usually beat a smarter model outright.

For GPT 5.5 specifically, that means output tokens cost 6.0x more than input, at $30.00 vs $5.00 per MTok. At this use case’s 3,000/500 token split, output accounts for 50% of the $0.0300 per-call cost.

Complete GPT 5.5 pricing breakdown

Standard token rates

Direction$/MTokTokens per call
Input$5.003,000
Output$30.00500

Prompt caching: 90% off input tokens

Caching drops input cost from $5.00 to $0.50/MTok. For repeated system prompts, that saves $0.0135 per call.

Batch API: 50% off all tokens

Submit requests asynchronously and receive 50% off all token costs. This works best for offline pipelines where latency requirements are flexible.

Monthly cost projections

Monthly volumeCost per callStandard monthlyCached monthlyYou save with caching
10,000 calls$0.0300$300$165$135
50,000 calls$0.0300$1,500$825$675
100,000 calls$0.0300$3,000$1,650$1,350
500,000 calls$0.0300$15,000$8,250$6,750
1,000,000 calls$0.0300$30,000$16,500$13,500

GPT 5.5 quality benchmarks for email summarization

GPT 5.5 is a solid pick for email summarization

Scores 89/100 (rank #3 of 20). Good balance of quality and cost for email summarization.

Top-ranked: GPT 5.6 Terra (92/100) at $0.0120/call

Performance across all task types

GPT 5.5 scores by task type. Email Summarization highlighted.

Reasoning95Code Generation91Creative Writing91Code Review90Q&A90Summarization *89Extraction87Classification85
Task typeConfidence scoreRank out of 20
Reasoning95/100#2
Code Generation91/100#3
Creative Writing91/100#2
Code Review90/100#3
Q&A90/100#2
Summarization(current page)89/100#3
Extraction87/100#4
Classification85/100#3

Confidence scores are a third-party benchmark snapshot from week 29 of 2026. This snapshot is 8 weeks old, so treat the scores as directional and validate against your own evals.

Alternative models for email summarization

12 models score 80+ on email summarization benchmarks, sorted by input rate. Cheapest: GPT 5.6 Luna (96% less, 84/100 quality).

ModelProviderInput $/MTokOutput $/MTokQualityPer callvs GPT
GPT 5.6 LunaGPT$0.20$1.2084/100$0.00120096% cheaper
Gemini 3 FlashGemini$0.50$3.0083/100$0.00300090% cheaper
Claude Haiku 4.5Claude$1.00$5.0082/100$0.00550082% cheaper
Gemini 3.5 FlashGemini$1.50$9.0085/100$0.00900070% cheaper
Claude Sonnet 5Claude$2.00$10.0091/100$0.011063% cheaper
GPT 5.6 TerraGPT$2.00$12.0092/100$0.012060% cheaper
Gemini 3.1 ProGemini$2.00$12.0087/100$0.012060% cheaper
GPT 5.4GPT$2.50$15.0091/100$0.015050% cheaper
Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude$3.00$15.0090/100$0.016545% cheaper
GPT 5.6 SolGPT$4.00$20.0090/100$0.022027% cheaper
Claude Opus 4.8Claude$5.00$25.0088/100$0.02758% cheaper
Claude Fable 5Claude$10.00$50.0090/100$0.055083% more

About GPT 5.5

Provider

GPT

Tier

Flagship

Context

1,050K tokens

Released

Mar 2026

Other models from GPT

ModelTierInput $/MTokOutput $/MTokContext
GPT 5.4Mid-tier$2.50$15.001,050K
GPT 5.6 SolFlagship$4.00$20.001,050K
GPT 5.6 TerraMid-tier$2.00$12.001,050K
GPT 5.6 LunaFast / Budget$0.20$1.201,050K

You can compare GPT 5.5 head-to-head against any other model on our model comparison pages, or track how pricing has changed over time on the pricing history tracker.

Frequently asked questions

How much does GPT 5.5 cost for email summarization per API call?

A typical email summarization call using GPT 5.5 costs about $0.0300 per call. This estimate uses 3,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens at standard rates. Standard rates are $5.00 per million input tokens and $30.00 per million output tokens.

Is GPT 5.5 the best model for email summarization?

GPT 5.5 scores 89 out of 100 on email summarization benchmarks overall. It ranks #3 across all 20 models in our cross-provider registry. The highest-ranked model for this task is GPT 5.6 Terra from GPT. That model scores 92/100 on this task type. Confidence scores are a third-party benchmark snapshot from week 29 of 2026. This snapshot is 8 weeks old, so treat the scores as directional and validate against your own evals.

What is the cheapest model for email summarization with good quality?

The most affordable model for email summarization above 80/100 quality is GPT 5.6 Luna. It comes from GPT at $0.20 per million input tokens. Output costs $1.20 per million tokens with a quality score of 84/100. Switching from GPT 5.5 to GPT 5.6 Luna saves about 96% per API call.

How can I reduce my GPT 5.5 costs for email summarization?

Three strategies lower GPT 5.5 costs for this task type effectively. Prompt caching gives a 90% discount on input tokens when reusing system prompts. The batch API gives 50% off all tokens for asynchronous processing workloads. Prompt optimization reduces token counts through more concise instructions and context windows. Combining caching with batching brings your cost from $0.0300 to about $0.001500 per call.

How does GPT 5.5 pricing compare to other GPT models?

GPT has 4 other models alongside GPT 5.5 today: GPT 5.4 at $2.50/$15.00 per million tokens (mid-tier), GPT 5.6 Sol at $4.00/$20.00 per million tokens (flagship), GPT 5.6 Terra at $2.00/$12.00 per million tokens (mid-tier), GPT 5.6 Luna at $0.20/$1.20 per million tokens (fast / budget). The right choice depends on whether your email summarization workload prioritizes quality, cost, or speed.

What context window does GPT 5.5 support?

GPT 5.5 supports a context window of 1,050K tokens per API call. This sets the maximum combined length of your input prompt and generated response. For email summarization, typical calls use 3,000 input and 500 output tokens. That is well within this limit, leaving room for longer prompts or multi-turn conversations.

Track what you spend on AI

This calculator estimates costs based on published rates only. Connect your API usage to see where your money goes and which models drive your spend.