tokevenGPT 4o (2024-05-13) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 4o (2024-05-13)
FlagshipGemini 3.5 Flash
Fast / BudgetQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use GPT 4o (2024-05-13) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Choose GPT 4o (2024-05-13) when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash when...
- -Cost matters: 70% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 128K)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use GPT 4o (2024-05-13) instead of Gemini 3.5 Flash?
GPT 4o (2024-05-13) and Gemini 3.5 Flash perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash cheaper than GPT 4o (2024-05-13)?
Yes. Gemini 3.5 Flash input costs $1.50/MTok vs $5.00/MTok for GPT 4o (2024-05-13), saving 70% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 4o (2024-05-13) and Gemini 3.5 Flash?
GPT 4o (2024-05-13) has a 128K token context window. Gemini 3.5 Flash has a 1,048.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 4o (2024-05-13) and Gemini 3.5 Flash stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.