tokevenClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Haiku 4.5
Fast / BudgetGemini 3.5 Flash
Fast / BudgetQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when...
- -You need strong q&a (confidence 86 vs 84)
- -You need strong code generation (confidence 72 vs 68)
- -You need strong code review (confidence 70 vs 65)
- -You need strong reasoning (confidence 65 vs 60)
- -Cost matters: 33% cheaper on input tokens
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash when...
- -You need strong classification (confidence 92 vs 90)
- -You need strong extraction (confidence 90 vs 88)
- -You need strong summarization (confidence 85 vs 82)
- -You need a larger context window (1,000K vs 200K)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use Claude Haiku 4.5 instead of Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms Gemini 3.5 Flash for Q&A, Code Generation, Code Review. It costs $1.00/$5.00 per million tokens (input/output).
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5?
Gemini 3.5 Flash input costs $1.50/MTok, which is 50% more than Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1.00/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window. Gemini 3.5 Flash has a 1,000K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.