tokevenGPTvsGPT
GPT 4.1 Nano vs o1
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 4.1 Nano
Fast / Budgeto1
FlagshipInput $/MTok
$0.10
$15.00
Output $/MTok
$0.40
$60.00
Cache discount
75% off
50% off
Context
1,047.576K
200K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
GPT 4.1 Nano
o1
Guidance
When to use GPT 4.1 Nano vs o1
Choose GPT 4.1 Nano when...
- -Cost matters: 99% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,047.576K vs 200K)
Choose o1 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 4.1 Nano
o1
100K tokens
$0.02Cheaper
$2.85
1M tokens
$0.19Cheaper
$28.50
10M tokens
$1.90Cheaper
$285.00
FAQ
When should I use GPT 4.1 Nano instead of o1?
GPT 4.1 Nano and o1 perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is o1 cheaper than GPT 4.1 Nano?
o1 input costs $15.00/MTok, which is 14900% more than GPT 4.1 Nano at $0.10/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 4.1 Nano and o1?
GPT 4.1 Nano has a 1,047.576K token context window. o1 has a 200K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 4.1 Nano and o1 stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.