tokevenClaudevsGPT
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o1
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Mid-tiero1
FlagshipInput $/MTok
$3.00
$15.00
Output $/MTok
$15.00
$60.00
Cache discount
90% off
50% off
Context
1,000K
200K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
92
vs
0
Code Review
95
vs
0
Summarization
90
vs
0
Q&A
88
vs
0
Extraction
86
vs
0
Reasoning
88
vs
0
Classification
84
vs
0
Creative Writing
85
vs
0
Claude Sonnet 4.6
o1
Guidance
When to use Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o1
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when...
- -Cost matters: 80% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,000K vs 200K)
Choose o1 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
o1
100K tokens
$0.66Cheaper
$2.85
1M tokens
$6.60Cheaper
$28.50
10M tokens
$66.00Cheaper
$285.00
FAQ
When should I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 instead of o1?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o1 perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is o1 cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6?
o1 input costs $15.00/MTok, which is 400% more than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $3.00/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o1?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000K token context window. o1 has a 200K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o1 stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.