tokevenGeminivsAlibaba (Qwen)
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3.8 Max
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Mid-tierQwen 3.8 Max
FlagshipInput $/MTok
$2.00
$2.00
Output $/MTok
$12.00
$6.00
Cache discount
90% off
88% off
Context
1.0M
1M
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
57
vs
0
Code Review
84
vs
0
Summarization
80
vs
0
Q&A
87
vs
0
Extraction
75
vs
0
Reasoning
84
vs
0
Classification
86
vs
0
Creative Writing
77
vs
0
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Qwen 3.8 Max
Guidance
When to use Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3.8 Max
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when...
- -You need a larger context window (1.0M vs 1M)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Qwen 3.8 Max when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Qwen 3.8 Max
100K tokens
$0.50
$0.32Cheaper
1M tokens
$8.20
$3.20Cheaper
10M tokens
$82.00
$32.00Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use Gemini 3.1 Pro instead of Qwen 3.8 Max?
Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen 3.8 Max perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Qwen 3.8 Max cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Both models have the same input pricing at $2.00/MTok. Compare output pricing: $12.00 vs $6.00/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen 3.8 Max?
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a 1.0M token context window. Qwen 3.8 Max has a 1M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Gemini 3.1 Pro and Qwen 3.8 Max stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.