tokevenClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Haiku 4.5
Fast / BudgetGemini 3.1 Pro
Mid-tierQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when...
- -You need strong classification (confidence 90 vs 86)
- -You need strong extraction (confidence 88 vs 75)
- -You need strong summarization (confidence 82 vs 80)
- -You need strong code generation (confidence 72 vs 57)
- -Cost matters: 50% cheaper on input tokens
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when...
- -You need strong q&a (confidence 87 vs 86)
- -You need strong code review (confidence 84 vs 70)
- -You need strong reasoning (confidence 84 vs 65)
- -You need strong creative writing (confidence 77 vs 60)
- -You need a larger context window (1.0M vs 200K)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use Claude Haiku 4.5 instead of Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms Gemini 3.1 Pro for Classification, Extraction, Summarization. It costs $1.00/$5.00 per million tokens (input/output).
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro input costs $2.00/MTok, which is 100% more than Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1.00/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window. Gemini 3.1 Pro has a 1.0M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.