tokevenClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Mid-tierGemini 3.1 Pro
Mid-tierQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when...
- -You need strong code review (confidence 95 vs 84)
- -You need strong code generation (confidence 92 vs 86)
- -You need strong summarization (confidence 90 vs 87)
- -You need strong q&a (confidence 88 vs 87)
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when...
- -You need strong reasoning (confidence 90 vs 88)
- -You need strong classification (confidence 86 vs 84)
- -Cost matters: 33% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,000K vs 200K)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 instead of Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms Gemini 3.1 Pro for Code Generation, Code Review, Summarization. It costs $3.00/$15.00 per million tokens (input/output).
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Yes. Gemini 3.1 Pro input costs $2.00/MTok vs $3.00/MTok for Claude Sonnet 4.6, saving 33% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 200K token context window. Gemini 3.1 Pro has a 1,000K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.