GPT · Flagship · 128K context window
$0.0365 per call at 2,500 input / 800 output tokens.
Per call
$0.0365
10K calls/mo
$365
Cache savings
90% off input
Batch savings
50% off all
Adjust token counts, volume, and discount toggles to model your resume parsing spend. Pricing updated weekly.
Call GPT 5.5 with the OpenAI Python SDK:
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-5.5",
max_tokens=800,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your prompt here"}]
)
# Cost: ~$0.0365 per call at standard rates
# Input: $5.00/MTok
# Output: $30.00/MTokPer-call cost for all models scoring 50+ on resume parsing benchmarks. Hover for details.
Cheapest viable option: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at $0.001825/call (95% less, 83/100 quality).
| Direction | $/MTok | Tokens per call |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $5.00 | 2,500 |
| Output | $30.00 | 800 |
Caching drops input cost from $5.00 to $0.50/MTok. For repeated system prompts, that saves $0.0113 per call.
Submit requests asynchronously and receive 50% off all token costs. This works best for offline pipelines where latency requirements are flexible.
| Monthly volume | Cost per call | Standard monthly | Cached monthly | You save with caching |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,000 calls | $0.0365 | $365 | $252.5 | $112.5 |
| 50,000 calls | $0.0365 | $1,825 | $1,262.5 | $562.5 |
| 100,000 calls | $0.0365 | $3,650 | $2,525 | $1,125 |
| 500,000 calls | $0.0365 | $18,250 | $12,625 | $5,625 |
| 1,000,000 calls | $0.0365 | $36,500 | $25,250 | $11,250 |
GPT 5.5 is a solid pick for resume parsing
Scores 87/100 (rank #4 of 14). Good balance of quality and cost for resume parsing.
Top-ranked: GPT 5.6 Terra (90/100) at $0.0183/call
GPT 5.5 scores by task type. Resume Parsing highlighted.
| Task type | Confidence score | Rank out of 14 |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | 95/100 | #2 |
| Code Generation | 91/100 | #3 |
| Creative Writing | 91/100 | #2 |
| Code Review | 90/100 | #3 |
| Q&A | 90/100 | #2 |
| Summarization | 89/100 | #3 |
| Extraction(current page) | 87/100 | #4 |
| Classification | 85/100 | #3 |
13 models score 80+ on resume parsing benchmarks, sorted by input rate. Cheapest: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (95% less, 83/100 quality).
| Model | Provider | Input $/MTok | Output $/MTok | Quality | Per call | vs GPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Gemini | $0.25 | $1.50 | 83/100 | $0.001825 | 95% cheaper |
| Gemini 3 Flash | Gemini | $0.50 | $3.00 | 86/100 | $0.003650 | 90% cheaper |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude | $1.00 | $5.00 | 88/100 | $0.006500 | 82% cheaper |
| GPT 5.6 Luna | GPT | $1.00 | $6.00 | 89/100 | $0.007300 | 80% cheaper |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini | $1.50 | $9.00 | 90/100 | $0.0110 | 70% cheaper |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Claude | $2.00 | $10.00 | 88/100 | $0.0130 | 64% cheaper |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini | $2.00 | $12.00 | 85/100 | $0.0146 | 60% cheaper |
| GPT 5.4 | GPT | $2.50 | $15.00 | 89/100 | $0.0183 | 50% cheaper |
| GPT 5.6 Terra | GPT | $2.50 | $15.00 | 90/100 | $0.0183 | 50% cheaper |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Claude | $3.00 | $15.00 | 86/100 | $0.0195 | 47% cheaper |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Claude | $5.00 | $25.00 | 82/100 | $0.0325 | 11% cheaper |
| GPT 5.6 Sol | GPT | $5.00 | $30.00 | 88/100 | $0.0365 | same cost |
| Claude Fable 5 | Claude | $10.00 | $50.00 | 85/100 | $0.0650 | 78% more |
Provider
GPT
Tier
Flagship
Context
128K tokens
Released
Mar 2026
| Model | Tier | Input $/MTok | Output $/MTok | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT 5.4 | Mid-tier | $2.50 | $15.00 | 128K |
| GPT 5.6 Sol | Flagship | $5.00 | $30.00 | 1,000K |
| GPT 5.6 Terra | Mid-tier | $2.50 | $15.00 | 1,000K |
| GPT 5.6 Luna | Fast / Budget | $1.00 | $6.00 | 1,000K |
You can compare GPT 5.5 head-to-head against any other model on our model comparison pages, or track how pricing has changed over time on the pricing history tracker.
See how GPT 5.5 costs change across different workload types.
Code Generation
$0.1300/call
Unit Test Generation
$0.1650/call
SQL Generation
$0.0375/call
API Generation
$0.1950/call
Code Refactoring
$0.1400/call
Code Review
$0.0850/call
PR Review
$0.1300/call
Security Review
$0.1050/call
Bug Detection
$0.0850/call
Document Summarization
$0.0800/call
PDF Summarization
$0.1200/call
Meeting Notes
$0.1000/call
Email Summarization
$0.0300/call
Chatbot
$0.0400/call
RAG Pipeline
$0.0750/call
Customer Support Bot
$0.0450/call
FAQ Bot
$0.0315/call
Data Extraction
$0.0500/call
JSON Extraction
$0.0390/call
Invoice Parsing
$0.0280/call
Chain of Thought
$0.1650/call
Legal Analysis
$0.1700/call
Math Reasoning
$0.0975/call
Financial Analysis
$0.1600/call
Content Moderation
$0.005500/call
Sentiment Analysis
$0.005500/call
Categorization
$0.008500/call
Intent Detection
$0.004500/call
Copywriting
$0.0625/call
Blog Writing
$0.2450/call
Marketing Copy
$0.0940/call
Product Descriptions
$0.0475/call
$0.0365 per call at 2,500 input / 800 output tokens.
Scores 87/100, rank #4 of 14 models. Top-ranked: GPT 5.6 Terra at 90/100.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores 83/100 quality at $0.25/$1.50 per MTok. That is 95% less than GPT 5.5 per call.
Three strategies: prompt caching (90% off input), batch API (50% off all tokens), prompt optimization. Combined: $0.0365 drops to about $0.001825 per call.
GPT also offers: GPT 5.4 at $2.50/$15.00, GPT 5.6 Sol at $5.00/$30.00, GPT 5.6 Terra at $2.50/$15.00, GPT 5.6 Luna at $1.00/$6.00.
128K tokens total. Typical resume parsing calls use 2,500 plus 800 tokens, well within limits.
This calculator estimates costs based on published rates only. Connect your API usage to see where your money goes and which models drive your spend.