Claude · Fast / Budget · 200K context window
$0.0135 per call at 6,000 input / 1,500 output tokens.
Per call
$0.0135
10K calls/mo
$135
Cache savings
90% off input
Batch savings
50% off all
Adjust token counts, volume, and discount toggles to model your rag pipeline spend. Prices verified daily against provider pricing pages.
Call Claude Haiku 4.5 with the Anthropic Python SDK:
from anthropic import Anthropic
client = Anthropic()
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-haiku-4-5",
max_tokens=1500,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your prompt here"}]
)
# Cost: ~$0.0135 per call at standard rates
# Input: $1.00/MTok
# Output: $5.00/MTokPer-call cost for all models scoring 50+ on rag pipeline benchmarks. Hover for details.
Cheapest viable option: GPT 5.6 Luna at $0.003000/call (78% less, 85/100 quality).
Retrieval-augmented calls are dominated by the retrieved passages, not the question. Retrieving eight chunks instead of three roughly triples input cost for an answer that is often no better, so retrieval tuning is cost tuning. The system prompt and instructions are identical on every call, which makes cache reads the first thing to enable.
For Claude Haiku 4.5 specifically, that means output tokens cost 5.0x more than input, at $5.00 vs $1.00 per MTok. At this use case’s 6,000/1,500 token split, output accounts for 56% of the $0.0135 per-call cost.
| Direction | $/MTok | Tokens per call |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $1.00 | 6,000 |
| Output | $5.00 | 1,500 |
Caching drops input cost from $1.00 to $0.10/MTok. For repeated system prompts, that saves $0.005400 per call.
Submit requests asynchronously and receive 50% off all token costs. This works best for offline pipelines where latency requirements are flexible.
| Monthly volume | Cost per call | Standard monthly | Cached monthly | You save with caching |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,000 calls | $0.0135 | $135 | $81 | $54 |
| 50,000 calls | $0.0135 | $675 | $405 | $270 |
| 100,000 calls | $0.0135 | $1,350 | $810 | $540 |
| 500,000 calls | $0.0135 | $6,750 | $4,050 | $2,700 |
| 1,000,000 calls | $0.0135 | $13,500 | $8,100 | $5,400 |
Claude Haiku 4.5 is a solid pick for rag pipeline
Scores 86/100 (rank #4 of 20). Good balance of quality and cost for rag pipeline.
Top-ranked: GPT 5.6 Terra (92/100) at $0.0300/call
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores by task type. RAG Pipeline highlighted.
| Task type | Confidence score | Rank out of 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | 90/100 | #2 |
| Extraction | 88/100 | #2 |
| Q&A(current page) | 86/100 | #4 |
| Summarization | 82/100 | #5 |
| Code Generation | 72/100 | #6 |
| Code Review | 70/100 | #7 |
| Reasoning | 65/100 | #7 |
| Creative Writing | 60/100 | #7 |
Confidence scores are a third-party benchmark snapshot from week 29 of 2026. This snapshot is 8 weeks old, so treat the scores as directional and validate against your own evals.
12 models score 80+ on rag pipeline benchmarks, sorted by input rate. Cheapest: GPT 5.6 Luna (78% less, 85/100 quality).
| Model | Provider | Input $/MTok | Output $/MTok | Quality | Per call | vs Claude |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT 5.6 Luna | GPT | $0.20 | $1.20 | 85/100 | $0.003000 | 78% cheaper |
| Gemini 3 Flash | Gemini | $0.50 | $3.00 | 82/100 | $0.007500 | 44% cheaper |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini | $1.50 | $9.00 | 84/100 | $0.0225 | 67% more |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Claude | $2.00 | $10.00 | 89/100 | $0.0270 | 100% more |
| GPT 5.6 Terra | GPT | $2.00 | $12.00 | 92/100 | $0.0300 | 122% more |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini | $2.00 | $12.00 | 87/100 | $0.0300 | 122% more |
| GPT 5.4 | GPT | $2.50 | $15.00 | 91/100 | $0.0375 | 178% more |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Claude | $3.00 | $15.00 | 88/100 | $0.0405 | 200% more |
| GPT 5.6 Sol | GPT | $4.00 | $20.00 | 91/100 | $0.0540 | 300% more |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Claude | $5.00 | $25.00 | 85/100 | $0.0675 | 400% more |
| GPT 5.5 | GPT | $5.00 | $30.00 | 90/100 | $0.0750 | 456% more |
| Claude Fable 5 | Claude | $10.00 | $50.00 | 88/100 | $0.1350 | 900% more |
Provider
Claude
Tier
Fast / Budget
Context
200K tokens
Released
Oct 2025
| Model | Tier | Input $/MTok | Output $/MTok | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Flagship | $5.00 | $25.00 | 200K |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Mid-tier | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Mid-tier | $2.00 | $10.00 | 200K |
| Claude Opus 5 | Flagship | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1,000K |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Flagship | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1,000K |
| Claude Fable 5 | Flagship | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1,000K |
You can compare Claude Haiku 4.5 head-to-head against any other model on our model comparison pages, or track how pricing has changed over time on the pricing history tracker.
See how Claude Haiku 4.5 costs change across different workload types.
Code Generation
$0.0220/call
Unit Test Generation
$0.0280/call
SQL Generation
$0.006500/call
API Generation
$0.0330/call
Code Refactoring
$0.0240/call
Code Review
$0.0150/call
PR Review
$0.0230/call
Security Review
$0.0185/call
Bug Detection
$0.0150/call
Document Summarization
$0.0150/call
PDF Summarization
$0.0225/call
Meeting Notes
$0.0180/call
Email Summarization
$0.005500/call
Chatbot
$0.007000/call
Customer Support Bot
$0.008000/call
FAQ Bot
$0.005500/call
Data Extraction
$0.009000/call
JSON Extraction
$0.007000/call
Invoice Parsing
$0.005000/call
Resume Parsing
$0.006500/call
Chain of Thought
$0.0280/call
Legal Analysis
$0.0300/call
Math Reasoning
$0.0165/call
Financial Analysis
$0.0280/call
Content Moderation
$0.001000/call
Sentiment Analysis
$0.001000/call
Categorization
$0.001550/call
Intent Detection
$0.000800/call
Copywriting
$0.0105/call
Blog Writing
$0.0410/call
Marketing Copy
$0.0158/call
Product Descriptions
$0.008000/call
A typical rag pipeline call using Claude Haiku 4.5 costs about $0.0135 per call. This estimate uses 6,000 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens at standard rates. Standard rates are $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens.
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 86 out of 100 on rag pipeline benchmarks overall. It ranks #4 across all 20 models in our cross-provider registry. The highest-ranked model for this task is GPT 5.6 Terra from GPT. That model scores 92/100 on this task type. Confidence scores are a third-party benchmark snapshot from week 29 of 2026. This snapshot is 8 weeks old, so treat the scores as directional and validate against your own evals.
The most affordable model for rag pipeline above 80/100 quality is GPT 5.6 Luna. It comes from GPT at $0.20 per million input tokens. Output costs $1.20 per million tokens with a quality score of 85/100. Switching from Claude Haiku 4.5 to GPT 5.6 Luna saves about 78% per API call.
Three strategies lower Claude Haiku 4.5 costs for this task type effectively. Prompt caching gives a 90% discount on input tokens when reusing system prompts. The batch API gives 50% off all tokens for asynchronous processing workloads. Prompt optimization reduces token counts through more concise instructions and context windows. Combining caching with batching brings your cost from $0.0135 to about $0.000675 per call.
Claude has 6 other models alongside Claude Haiku 4.5 today: Claude Opus 4.8 at $5.00/$25.00 per million tokens (flagship), Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $3.00/$15.00 per million tokens (mid-tier), Claude Sonnet 5 at $2.00/$10.00 per million tokens (mid-tier), Claude Opus 5 at $5.00/$25.00 per million tokens (flagship), Claude Fable 5.1 at $10.00/$50.00 per million tokens (flagship), Claude Fable 5 at $10.00/$50.00 per million tokens (flagship). The right choice depends on whether your rag pipeline workload prioritizes quality, cost, or speed.
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports a context window of 200K tokens per API call. This sets the maximum combined length of your input prompt and generated response. For rag pipeline, typical calls use 6,000 input and 1,500 output tokens. That is well within this limit, leaving room for longer prompts or multi-turn conversations.
This calculator estimates costs based on published rates only. Connect your API usage to see where your money goes and which models drive your spend.