Claude · Mid-tier · 200K context window
$0.001600 per call at 300 input / 100 output tokens.
Per call
$0.001600
10K calls/mo
$16
Cache savings
90% off input
Batch savings
50% off all
Adjust token counts, volume, and discount toggles to model your intent detection spend. Prices verified daily against provider pricing pages.
Call Claude Sonnet 5 with the Anthropic Python SDK:
from anthropic import Anthropic
client = Anthropic()
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-5",
max_tokens=100,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your prompt here"}]
)
# Cost: ~$0.001600 per call at standard rates
# Input: $2.00/MTok
# Output: $10.00/MTokPer-call cost for all models scoring 50+ on intent detection benchmarks. Hover for details.
Cheapest viable option: GPT 5.6 Luna at $0.000180/call (89% less, 91/100 quality).
Intent classification sits in the hot path of a conversational product, so latency constrains model choice more than price does: batch processing is not available to you when the user is waiting. That makes the fast tier the natural fit on both axes. The intent list is constant and belongs in the cached prefix.
For Claude Sonnet 5 specifically, that means output tokens cost 5.0x more than input, at $10.00 vs $2.00 per MTok. At this use case’s 300/100 token split, output accounts for 63% of the $0.001600 per-call cost.
| Direction | $/MTok | Tokens per call |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $2.00 | 300 |
| Output | $10.00 | 100 |
Caching drops input cost from $2.00 to $0.20/MTok. For repeated system prompts, that saves $0.000540 per call.
Submit requests asynchronously and receive 50% off all token costs. This works best for offline pipelines where latency requirements are flexible.
| Monthly volume | Cost per call | Standard monthly | Cached monthly | You save with caching |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,000 calls | $0.001600 | $16 | $10.6 | $5.4 |
| 50,000 calls | $0.001600 | $80 | $53 | $27 |
| 100,000 calls | $0.001600 | $160 | $106 | $54 |
| 500,000 calls | $0.001600 | $800 | $530 | $270 |
| 1,000,000 calls | $0.001600 | $1,600 | $1,060 | $540 |
Claude Sonnet 5 is a solid pick for intent detection
Scores 86/100 (rank #3 of 20). Good balance of quality and cost for intent detection.
Top-ranked: Gemini 3.5 Flash (92/100) at $0.001350/call
Claude Sonnet 5 scores by task type. Intent Detection highlighted.
| Task type | Confidence score | Rank out of 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | 96/100 | #1 |
| Code Generation | 93/100 | #2 |
| Summarization | 91/100 | #1 |
| Reasoning | 90/100 | #2 |
| Q&A | 89/100 | #2 |
| Extraction | 88/100 | #2 |
| Creative Writing | 87/100 | #3 |
| Classification(current page) | 86/100 | #3 |
Confidence scores are a third-party benchmark snapshot from week 29 of 2026. This snapshot is 8 weeks old, so treat the scores as directional and validate against your own evals.
13 models score 80+ on intent detection benchmarks, sorted by input rate. Cheapest: GPT 5.6 Luna (89% less, 91/100 quality).
| Model | Provider | Input $/MTok | Output $/MTok | Quality | Per call | vs Claude |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT 5.6 Luna | GPT | $0.20 | $1.20 | 91/100 | $0.000180 | 89% cheaper |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Gemini | $0.30 | $2.50 | 85/100 | $0.000340 | 79% cheaper |
| Gemini 3 Flash | Gemini | $0.50 | $3.00 | 88/100 | $0.000450 | 72% cheaper |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude | $1.00 | $5.00 | 90/100 | $0.000800 | 50% cheaper |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini | $1.50 | $9.00 | 92/100 | $0.001350 | 16% cheaper |
| GPT 5.6 Terra | GPT | $2.00 | $12.00 | 89/100 | $0.001800 | 13% more |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini | $2.00 | $12.00 | 86/100 | $0.001800 | 13% more |
| GPT 5.4 | GPT | $2.50 | $15.00 | 88/100 | $0.002250 | 41% more |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Claude | $3.00 | $15.00 | 84/100 | $0.002400 | 50% more |
| GPT 5.6 Sol | GPT | $4.00 | $20.00 | 86/100 | $0.003200 | 100% more |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Claude | $5.00 | $25.00 | 80/100 | $0.004000 | 150% more |
| GPT 5.5 | GPT | $5.00 | $30.00 | 85/100 | $0.004500 | 181% more |
| Claude Fable 5 | Claude | $10.00 | $50.00 | 82/100 | $0.008000 | 400% more |
Provider
Claude
Tier
Mid-tier
Context
200K tokens
Released
Jun 2026
Launched at $2/$10 as introductory pricing through Aug 31, 2026. Anthropic cancelled the scheduled increase to $3/$15, so this is now the standard price.
| Model | Tier | Input $/MTok | Output $/MTok | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Flagship | $5.00 | $25.00 | 200K |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Mid-tier | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Fast / Budget | $1.00 | $5.00 | 200K |
| Claude Opus 5 | Flagship | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1,000K |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Flagship | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1,000K |
| Claude Fable 5 | Flagship | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1,000K |
You can compare Claude Sonnet 5 head-to-head against any other model on our model comparison pages, or track how pricing has changed over time on the pricing history tracker.
See how Claude Sonnet 5 costs change across different workload types.
Code Generation
$0.0440/call
Unit Test Generation
$0.0560/call
SQL Generation
$0.0130/call
API Generation
$0.0660/call
Code Refactoring
$0.0480/call
Code Review
$0.0300/call
PR Review
$0.0460/call
Security Review
$0.0370/call
Bug Detection
$0.0300/call
Document Summarization
$0.0300/call
PDF Summarization
$0.0450/call
Meeting Notes
$0.0360/call
Email Summarization
$0.0110/call
Chatbot
$0.0140/call
RAG Pipeline
$0.0270/call
Customer Support Bot
$0.0160/call
FAQ Bot
$0.0110/call
Data Extraction
$0.0180/call
JSON Extraction
$0.0140/call
Invoice Parsing
$0.010000/call
Resume Parsing
$0.0130/call
Chain of Thought
$0.0560/call
Legal Analysis
$0.0600/call
Math Reasoning
$0.0330/call
Financial Analysis
$0.0560/call
Content Moderation
$0.002000/call
Sentiment Analysis
$0.002000/call
Categorization
$0.003100/call
Copywriting
$0.0210/call
Blog Writing
$0.0820/call
Marketing Copy
$0.0316/call
Product Descriptions
$0.0160/call
A typical intent detection call using Claude Sonnet 5 costs about $0.001600 per call. This estimate uses 300 input tokens and 100 output tokens at standard rates. Standard rates are $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens.
Claude Sonnet 5 scores 86 out of 100 on intent detection benchmarks overall. It ranks #3 across all 20 models in our cross-provider registry. The highest-ranked model for this task is Gemini 3.5 Flash from Gemini. That model scores 92/100 on this task type. Confidence scores are a third-party benchmark snapshot from week 29 of 2026. This snapshot is 8 weeks old, so treat the scores as directional and validate against your own evals.
The most affordable model for intent detection above 80/100 quality is GPT 5.6 Luna. It comes from GPT at $0.20 per million input tokens. Output costs $1.20 per million tokens with a quality score of 91/100. Switching from Claude Sonnet 5 to GPT 5.6 Luna saves about 89% per API call.
Three strategies lower Claude Sonnet 5 costs for this task type effectively. Prompt caching gives a 90% discount on input tokens when reusing system prompts. The batch API gives 50% off all tokens for asynchronous processing workloads. Prompt optimization reduces token counts through more concise instructions and context windows. Combining caching with batching brings your cost from $0.001600 to about $0.000080 per call.
Claude has 6 other models alongside Claude Sonnet 5 today: Claude Opus 4.8 at $5.00/$25.00 per million tokens (flagship), Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $3.00/$15.00 per million tokens (mid-tier), Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1.00/$5.00 per million tokens (fast / budget), Claude Opus 5 at $5.00/$25.00 per million tokens (flagship), Claude Fable 5.1 at $10.00/$50.00 per million tokens (flagship), Claude Fable 5 at $10.00/$50.00 per million tokens (flagship). The right choice depends on whether your intent detection workload prioritizes quality, cost, or speed.
Claude Sonnet 5 supports a context window of 200K tokens per API call. This sets the maximum combined length of your input prompt and generated response. For intent detection, typical calls use 300 input and 100 output tokens. That is well within this limit, leaving room for longer prompts or multi-turn conversations.
This calculator estimates costs based on published rates only. Connect your API usage to see where your money goes and which models drive your spend.