tokevenGPTvsGemini
o3 vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
o3
Mid-tierGemini 2.5 Computer Use
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$2.00
$1.25
Output $/MTok
$8.00
$10.00
Cache discount
75% off
0% off
Context
200K
128K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
o3
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
Guidance
When to use o3 vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
Choose o3 when...
- -You need a larger context window (200K vs 128K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Computer Use when...
- -Cost matters: 38% cheaper on input tokens
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
o3
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
100K tokens
$0.38Cheaper
$0.39
1M tokens
$3.80Cheaper
$6.25
10M tokens
$38.00Cheaper
$62.50
FAQ
When should I use o3 instead of Gemini 2.5 Computer Use?
o3 and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini 2.5 Computer Use cheaper than o3?
Yes. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use input costs $1.25/MTok vs $2.00/MTok for o3, saving 38% on input.
What are the context window sizes for o3 and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use?
o3 has a 200K token context window. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use has a 128K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How o3 and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.