tokevenGrokvsAlibaba (Qwen)
Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen 3.8 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Grok Build 0.1
Fast / BudgetQwen 3.8 Flash
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$1.00
$0.15
Output $/MTok
$2.00
$0.47
Cache discount
80% off
89% off
Context
256K
1M
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
54
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
63
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
71
vs
0
Reasoning
76
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
73
vs
0
Grok Build 0.1
Qwen 3.8 Flash
Guidance
When to use Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen 3.8 Flash
Choose Grok Build 0.1 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Qwen 3.8 Flash when...
- -Cost matters: 85% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1M vs 256K)
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Grok Build 0.1
Qwen 3.8 Flash
100K tokens
$0.13
$0.02Cheaper
1M tokens
$2.60
$0.25Cheaper
10M tokens
$26.00
$2.46Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use Grok Build 0.1 instead of Qwen 3.8 Flash?
Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen 3.8 Flash perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Qwen 3.8 Flash cheaper than Grok Build 0.1?
Yes. Qwen 3.8 Flash input costs $0.15/MTok vs $1.00/MTok for Grok Build 0.1, saving 85% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen 3.8 Flash?
Grok Build 0.1 has a 256K token context window. Qwen 3.8 Flash has a 1M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen 3.8 Flash stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.