GPTvsGemini

GPT 6 Luna vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.

Pricing

Side-by-side pricing

GPT 6 Luna

Fast / Budget

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Fast / Budget
Input $/MTok
$0.10
$0.10
Output $/MTok
$0.50
$0.40
Cache discount
90% off
90% off
Context
922K
1,048.576K

Quality

Task confidence comparison

Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
GPT 6 Luna
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Guidance

When to use GPT 6 Luna vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Choose GPT 6 Luna when...

  • Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite when...

  • -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 922K)
  • Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.

At scale

Cost at scale

Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 6 Luna
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
100K tokens
$0.02
$0.02Cheaper
1M tokens
$0.36
$0.19Cheaper
10M tokens
$3.65
$1.90Cheaper

FAQ

When should I use GPT 6 Luna instead of Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

GPT 6 Luna and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than GPT 6 Luna?

Both models have the same input pricing at $0.10/MTok. Compare output pricing: $0.50 vs $0.40/MTok.

What are the context window sizes for GPT 6 Luna and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

GPT 6 Luna has a 922K token context window. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a 1,048.576K token context window.

Track your real costs

Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.