tokevenGPTvsGemini
GPT 5 Nano vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 5 Nano
Fast / BudgetGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$0.05
$0.25
Output $/MTok
$0.40
$1.50
Cache discount
90% off
90% off
Context
272K
1,048.576K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
GPT 5 Nano
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Guidance
When to use GPT 5 Nano vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Choose GPT 5 Nano when...
- -Cost matters: 80% cheaper on input tokens
Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when...
- -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 272K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 5 Nano
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
100K tokens
$0.02Cheaper
$0.06
1M tokens
$0.15Cheaper
$0.63
10M tokens
$1.55Cheaper
$6.25
FAQ
When should I use GPT 5 Nano instead of Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
GPT 5 Nano and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite cheaper than GPT 5 Nano?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite input costs $0.25/MTok, which is 400% more than GPT 5 Nano at $0.05/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 5 Nano and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
GPT 5 Nano has a 272K token context window. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a 1,048.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 5 Nano and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.