tokevenGPTvsMoonshot (Kimi)
GPT 5.6 Terra vs Kimi K2
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 5.6 Terra
Mid-tierKimi K2
Mid-tierInput $/MTok
$2.00
$0.95
Output $/MTok
$12.00
$4.00
Cache discount
90% off
83% off
Context
922K
256K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
64
vs
0
Code Review
84
vs
0
Summarization
64
vs
0
Q&A
92
vs
0
Extraction
75
vs
0
Reasoning
91
vs
0
Classification
89
vs
0
Creative Writing
67
vs
0
GPT 5.6 Terra
Kimi K2
Guidance
When to use GPT 5.6 Terra vs Kimi K2
Choose GPT 5.6 Terra when...
- -You need a larger context window (922K vs 256K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Kimi K2 when...
- -Cost matters: 53% cheaper on input tokens
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 5.6 Terra
Kimi K2
100K tokens
$0.50
$0.19Cheaper
1M tokens
$8.20
$1.86Cheaper
10M tokens
$82.00
$18.65Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use GPT 5.6 Terra instead of Kimi K2?
GPT 5.6 Terra and Kimi K2 perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Kimi K2 cheaper than GPT 5.6 Terra?
Yes. Kimi K2 input costs $0.95/MTok vs $2.00/MTok for GPT 5.6 Terra, saving 53% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 5.6 Terra and Kimi K2?
GPT 5.6 Terra has a 922K token context window. Kimi K2 has a 256K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 5.6 Terra and Kimi K2 stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.