tokevenGPTvsGPT
GPT 5.6 Terra vs GPT 4.1 Nano
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 5.6 Terra
Mid-tierGPT 4.1 Nano
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$2.00
$0.10
Output $/MTok
$12.00
$0.40
Cache discount
90% off
75% off
Context
922K
1,047.576K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
86
vs
0
Code Review
84
vs
0
Summarization
92
vs
0
Q&A
92
vs
0
Extraction
90
vs
0
Reasoning
82
vs
0
Classification
89
vs
0
Creative Writing
80
vs
0
GPT 5.6 Terra
GPT 4.1 Nano
Guidance
When to use GPT 5.6 Terra vs GPT 4.1 Nano
Choose GPT 5.6 Terra when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose GPT 4.1 Nano when...
- -Cost matters: 95% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,047.576K vs 922K)
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 5.6 Terra
GPT 4.1 Nano
100K tokens
$0.50
$0.02Cheaper
1M tokens
$8.20
$0.19Cheaper
10M tokens
$82.00
$1.90Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use GPT 5.6 Terra instead of GPT 4.1 Nano?
GPT 5.6 Terra and GPT 4.1 Nano perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is GPT 4.1 Nano cheaper than GPT 5.6 Terra?
Yes. GPT 4.1 Nano input costs $0.10/MTok vs $2.00/MTok for GPT 5.6 Terra, saving 95% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 5.6 Terra and GPT 4.1 Nano?
GPT 5.6 Terra has a 922K token context window. GPT 4.1 Nano has a 1,047.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 5.6 Terra and GPT 4.1 Nano stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.