tokevenGPT 5.6 Terra vs GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 5.6 Terra
Mid-tierGPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)
Fast / BudgetQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use GPT 5.6 Terra vs GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)
Choose GPT 5.6 Terra when...
- -You need a larger context window (922K vs 16.385K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) when...
- -Cost matters: 75% cheaper on input tokens
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use GPT 5.6 Terra instead of GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)?
GPT 5.6 Terra and GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) cheaper than GPT 5.6 Terra?
Yes. GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) input costs $0.50/MTok vs $2.00/MTok for GPT 5.6 Terra, saving 75% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 5.6 Terra and GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)?
GPT 5.6 Terra has a 922K token context window. GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) has a 16.385K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 5.6 Terra and GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.