GPTvsGemini

GPT 5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.

Pricing

Side-by-side pricing

GPT 5.6 Terra

Mid-tier

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Fast / Budget
Input $/MTok
$2.00
$0.25
Output $/MTok
$12.00
$1.50
Cache discount
90% off
90% off
Context
922K
1,048.576K

Quality

Task confidence comparison

Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
86
vs
0
Code Review
84
vs
0
Summarization
92
vs
0
Q&A
92
vs
0
Extraction
90
vs
0
Reasoning
82
vs
0
Classification
89
vs
0
Creative Writing
80
vs
0
GPT 5.6 Terra
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Guidance

When to use GPT 5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Choose GPT 5.6 Terra when...

  • Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when...

  • -Cost matters: 88% cheaper on input tokens
  • -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 922K)

At scale

Cost at scale

Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 5.6 Terra
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
100K tokens
$0.50
$0.06Cheaper
1M tokens
$8.20
$0.63Cheaper
10M tokens
$82.00
$6.25Cheaper

FAQ

When should I use GPT 5.6 Terra instead of Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

GPT 5.6 Terra and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite cheaper than GPT 5.6 Terra?

Yes. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite input costs $0.25/MTok vs $2.00/MTok for GPT 5.6 Terra, saving 88% on input.

What are the context window sizes for GPT 5.6 Terra and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

GPT 5.6 Terra has a 922K token context window. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a 1,048.576K token context window.

Track your real costs

Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.