tokevenGPTvsGPT
GPT 5.6 Luna vs GPT 5 Nano
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 5.6 Luna
Fast / BudgetGPT 5 Nano
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$0.20
$0.05
Output $/MTok
$1.20
$0.40
Cache discount
90% off
90% off
Context
922K
272K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
70
vs
0
Code Review
68
vs
0
Summarization
84
vs
0
Q&A
85
vs
0
Extraction
89
vs
0
Reasoning
63
vs
0
Classification
91
vs
0
Creative Writing
58
vs
0
GPT 5.6 Luna
GPT 5 Nano
Guidance
When to use GPT 5.6 Luna vs GPT 5 Nano
Choose GPT 5.6 Luna when...
- -You need a larger context window (922K vs 272K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose GPT 5 Nano when...
- -Cost matters: 75% cheaper on input tokens
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 5.6 Luna
GPT 5 Nano
100K tokens
$0.05
$0.02Cheaper
1M tokens
$0.82
$0.15Cheaper
10M tokens
$8.20
$1.55Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use GPT 5.6 Luna instead of GPT 5 Nano?
GPT 5.6 Luna and GPT 5 Nano perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is GPT 5 Nano cheaper than GPT 5.6 Luna?
Yes. GPT 5 Nano input costs $0.05/MTok vs $0.20/MTok for GPT 5.6 Luna, saving 75% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 5.6 Luna and GPT 5 Nano?
GPT 5.6 Luna has a 922K token context window. GPT 5 Nano has a 272K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 5.6 Luna and GPT 5 Nano stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.