GPTvsGemini

GPT 5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.

Pricing

Side-by-side pricing

GPT 5.6 Luna

Fast / Budget

Gemini 3 Flash

Fast / Budget
Input $/MTok
$0.20
$0.50
Output $/MTok
$1.20
$3.00
Cache discount
90% off
90% off
Context
1,050K
1,000K

Quality

Task confidence comparison

Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
70
vs
65
Code Review
68
vs
62
Summarization
84
vs
83
Q&A
85
vs
82
Extraction
89
vs
86
Reasoning
63
vs
58
Classification
91
vs
88
Creative Writing
58
vs
52
GPT 5.6 Luna
Gemini 3 Flash

Guidance

When to use GPT 5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3 Flash

Choose GPT 5.6 Luna when...

  • -You need strong classification (confidence 91 vs 88)
  • -You need strong extraction (confidence 89 vs 86)
  • -You need strong q&a (confidence 85 vs 82)
  • -You need strong summarization (confidence 84 vs 83)
  • -Cost matters: 60% cheaper on input tokens
  • -You need a larger context window (1,050K vs 1,000K)

Choose Gemini 3 Flash when...

  • Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.

At scale

Cost at scale

Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 5.6 Luna
Gemini 3 Flash
100K tokens
$0.05Cheaper
$0.13
1M tokens
$0.82Cheaper
$1.25
10M tokens
$8.20Cheaper
$12.50

FAQ

When should I use GPT 5.6 Luna instead of Gemini 3 Flash?

GPT 5.6 Luna outperforms Gemini 3 Flash for Classification, Extraction, Q&A. It costs $0.20/$1.20 per million tokens (input/output).

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than GPT 5.6 Luna?

Gemini 3 Flash input costs $0.50/MTok, which is 150% more than GPT 5.6 Luna at $0.20/MTok.

What are the context window sizes for GPT 5.6 Luna and Gemini 3 Flash?

GPT 5.6 Luna has a 1,050K token context window. Gemini 3 Flash has a 1,000K token context window.

Track your real costs

Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.