tokevenGPTvsAlibaba (Qwen)
GPT 5.2 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 5.2
Mid-tierQwen 3.8 Max
FlagshipInput $/MTok
$1.75
$2.00
Output $/MTok
$14.00
$6.00
Cache discount
90% off
88% off
Context
272K
1M
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
GPT 5.2
Qwen 3.8 Max
Guidance
When to use GPT 5.2 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
Choose GPT 5.2 when...
- -Cost matters: 13% cheaper on input tokens
Choose Qwen 3.8 Max when...
- -You need a larger context window (1M vs 272K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 5.2
Qwen 3.8 Max
100K tokens
$0.54
$0.32Cheaper
1M tokens
$5.42
$3.20Cheaper
10M tokens
$54.25
$32.00Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use GPT 5.2 instead of Qwen 3.8 Max?
GPT 5.2 and Qwen 3.8 Max perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Qwen 3.8 Max cheaper than GPT 5.2?
Qwen 3.8 Max input costs $2.00/MTok, which is 14% more than GPT 5.2 at $1.75/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 5.2 and Qwen 3.8 Max?
GPT 5.2 has a 272K token context window. Qwen 3.8 Max has a 1M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 5.2 and Qwen 3.8 Max stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.