tokevenGPT 5.2 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 5.2 Pro
FlagshipGemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools
Mid-tierQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use GPT 5.2 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools
Choose GPT 5.2 Pro when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools when...
- -Cost matters: 90% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 272K)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use GPT 5.2 Pro instead of Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools?
GPT 5.2 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools cheaper than GPT 5.2 Pro?
Yes. Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools input costs $2.00/MTok vs $21.00/MTok for GPT 5.2 Pro, saving 90% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 5.2 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools?
GPT 5.2 Pro has a 272K token context window. Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools has a 1,048.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 5.2 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro Custom Tools stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.