tokevenGPTvsAlibaba (Qwen)
GPT 4o Mini vs Qwen 3.8 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 4o Mini
Fast / BudgetQwen 3.8 Flash
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$0.15
$0.15
Output $/MTok
$0.60
$0.47
Cache discount
50% off
89% off
Context
128K
1M
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
GPT 4o Mini
Qwen 3.8 Flash
Guidance
When to use GPT 4o Mini vs Qwen 3.8 Flash
Choose GPT 4o Mini when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Qwen 3.8 Flash when...
- -You need a larger context window (1M vs 128K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 4o Mini
Qwen 3.8 Flash
100K tokens
$0.03
$0.02Cheaper
1M tokens
$0.28
$0.25Cheaper
10M tokens
$2.85
$2.46Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use GPT 4o Mini instead of Qwen 3.8 Flash?
GPT 4o Mini and Qwen 3.8 Flash perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Qwen 3.8 Flash cheaper than GPT 4o Mini?
Both models have the same input pricing at $0.15/MTok. Compare output pricing: $0.60 vs $0.47/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 4o Mini and Qwen 3.8 Flash?
GPT 4o Mini has a 128K token context window. Qwen 3.8 Flash has a 1M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 4o Mini and Qwen 3.8 Flash stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.