tokevenGPTvsMoonshot (Kimi)
GPT 4o (2024-05-13) vs Kimi K3
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 4o (2024-05-13)
FlagshipKimi K3
FlagshipInput $/MTok
$5.00
$3.00
Output $/MTok
$15.00
$15.00
Cache discount
0% off
90% off
Context
128K
1M
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
GPT 4o (2024-05-13)
Kimi K3
Guidance
When to use GPT 4o (2024-05-13) vs Kimi K3
Choose GPT 4o (2024-05-13) when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Kimi K3 when...
- -Cost matters: 40% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1M vs 128K)
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 4o (2024-05-13)
Kimi K3
100K tokens
$0.80
$0.66Cheaper
1M tokens
$8.00
$6.60Cheaper
10M tokens
$80.00
$66.00Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use GPT 4o (2024-05-13) instead of Kimi K3?
GPT 4o (2024-05-13) and Kimi K3 perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Kimi K3 cheaper than GPT 4o (2024-05-13)?
Yes. Kimi K3 input costs $3.00/MTok vs $5.00/MTok for GPT 4o (2024-05-13), saving 40% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 4o (2024-05-13) and Kimi K3?
GPT 4o (2024-05-13) has a 128K token context window. Kimi K3 has a 1M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 4o (2024-05-13) and Kimi K3 stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.