tokevenGPTvsGPT
GPT 4.1 Nano vs o3
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 4.1 Nano
Fast / Budgeto3
Mid-tierInput $/MTok
$0.10
$2.00
Output $/MTok
$0.40
$8.00
Cache discount
75% off
75% off
Context
1,047.576K
200K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
GPT 4.1 Nano
o3
Guidance
When to use GPT 4.1 Nano vs o3
Choose GPT 4.1 Nano when...
- -Cost matters: 95% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,047.576K vs 200K)
Choose o3 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 4.1 Nano
o3
100K tokens
$0.02Cheaper
$0.38
1M tokens
$0.19Cheaper
$3.80
10M tokens
$1.90Cheaper
$38.00
FAQ
When should I use GPT 4.1 Nano instead of o3?
GPT 4.1 Nano and o3 perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is o3 cheaper than GPT 4.1 Nano?
o3 input costs $2.00/MTok, which is 1900% more than GPT 4.1 Nano at $0.10/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 4.1 Nano and o3?
GPT 4.1 Nano has a 1,047.576K token context window. o3 has a 200K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 4.1 Nano and o3 stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.