tokevenGPT 3.5 Turbo vs Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 3.5 Turbo
Fast / BudgetGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Fast / BudgetQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use GPT 3.5 Turbo vs Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Choose GPT 3.5 Turbo when...
- -Cost matters: 67% cheaper on input tokens
Choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when...
- -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 16.385K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use GPT 3.5 Turbo instead of Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash?
GPT 3.5 Turbo and Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash cheaper than GPT 3.5 Turbo?
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash input costs $1.50/MTok, which is 200% more than GPT 3.5 Turbo at $0.50/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 3.5 Turbo and Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash?
GPT 3.5 Turbo has a 16.385K token context window. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has a 1,048.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 3.5 Turbo and Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.