tokevenGPTvsGemini
GPT 3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 3 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 3.5 Turbo
Fast / BudgetGemini 3 Flash
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$0.50
$0.50
Output $/MTok
$1.50
$3.00
Cache discount
0% off
90% off
Context
16.385K
1,048.576K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
65
Code Review
0
vs
62
Summarization
0
vs
83
Q&A
0
vs
82
Extraction
0
vs
86
Reasoning
0
vs
58
Classification
0
vs
88
Creative Writing
0
vs
52
GPT 3.5 Turbo
Gemini 3 Flash
Guidance
When to use GPT 3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 3 Flash
Choose GPT 3.5 Turbo when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Gemini 3 Flash when...
- -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 16.385K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 3.5 Turbo
Gemini 3 Flash
100K tokens
$0.08Cheaper
$0.13
1M tokens
$0.80Cheaper
$1.25
10M tokens
$8.00Cheaper
$12.50
FAQ
When should I use GPT 3.5 Turbo instead of Gemini 3 Flash?
GPT 3.5 Turbo and Gemini 3 Flash perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than GPT 3.5 Turbo?
Both models have the same input pricing at $0.50/MTok. Compare output pricing: $1.50 vs $3.00/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 3.5 Turbo and Gemini 3 Flash?
GPT 3.5 Turbo has a 16.385K token context window. Gemini 3 Flash has a 1,048.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 3.5 Turbo and Gemini 3 Flash stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.