tokevenGPTvsGemini
GPT 3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 3.5 Turbo
Fast / BudgetGemini 2.5 Flash
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$0.50
$0.30
Output $/MTok
$1.50
$2.50
Cache discount
0% off
90% off
Context
16.385K
1,048.576K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
GPT 3.5 Turbo
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Guidance
When to use GPT 3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Choose GPT 3.5 Turbo when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash when...
- -Cost matters: 40% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 16.385K)
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
GPT 3.5 Turbo
Gemini 2.5 Flash
100K tokens
$0.08Cheaper
$0.10
1M tokens
$0.80Cheaper
$0.96
10M tokens
$8.00Cheaper
$9.60
FAQ
When should I use GPT 3.5 Turbo instead of Gemini 2.5 Flash?
GPT 3.5 Turbo and Gemini 2.5 Flash perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash cheaper than GPT 3.5 Turbo?
Yes. Gemini 2.5 Flash input costs $0.30/MTok vs $0.50/MTok for GPT 3.5 Turbo, saving 40% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 3.5 Turbo and Gemini 2.5 Flash?
GPT 3.5 Turbo has a 16.385K token context window. Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 1,048.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 3.5 Turbo and Gemini 2.5 Flash stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.