tokevenGPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) vs GPT 4o (2024-05-13)
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)
Fast / BudgetGPT 4o (2024-05-13)
FlagshipQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) vs GPT 4o (2024-05-13)
Choose GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) when...
- -Cost matters: 90% cheaper on input tokens
Choose GPT 4o (2024-05-13) when...
- -You need a larger context window (128K vs 16.385K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) instead of GPT 4o (2024-05-13)?
GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) and GPT 4o (2024-05-13) perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is GPT 4o (2024-05-13) cheaper than GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)?
GPT 4o (2024-05-13) input costs $5.00/MTok, which is 900% more than GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) at $0.50/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) and GPT 4o (2024-05-13)?
GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) has a 16.385K token context window. GPT 4o (2024-05-13) has a 128K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) and GPT 4o (2024-05-13) stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.