tokevenGPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)
Fast / BudgetGemini 2.5 Flash
Fast / BudgetQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Choose GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash when...
- -Cost matters: 40% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 16.385K)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) instead of Gemini 2.5 Flash?
GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) and Gemini 2.5 Flash perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash cheaper than GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)?
Yes. Gemini 2.5 Flash input costs $0.30/MTok vs $0.50/MTok for GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125), saving 40% on input.
What are the context window sizes for GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) and Gemini 2.5 Flash?
GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) has a 16.385K token context window. Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 1,048.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) and Gemini 2.5 Flash stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.