tokevenClaudevsGPT
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT 4.1 Mini
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Mid-tierGPT 4.1 Mini
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$3.00
$0.40
Output $/MTok
$15.00
$1.60
Cache discount
90% off
75% off
Context
1,000K
1,047.576K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
92
vs
0
Code Review
95
vs
0
Summarization
90
vs
0
Q&A
88
vs
0
Extraction
86
vs
0
Reasoning
88
vs
0
Classification
84
vs
0
Creative Writing
85
vs
0
Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPT 4.1 Mini
Guidance
When to use Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT 4.1 Mini
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose GPT 4.1 Mini when...
- -Cost matters: 87% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,047.576K vs 1,000K)
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPT 4.1 Mini
100K tokens
$0.66
$0.08Cheaper
1M tokens
$6.60
$0.76Cheaper
10M tokens
$66.00
$7.60Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 instead of GPT 4.1 Mini?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT 4.1 Mini perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is GPT 4.1 Mini cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Yes. GPT 4.1 Mini input costs $0.40/MTok vs $3.00/MTok for Claude Sonnet 4.6, saving 87% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT 4.1 Mini?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000K token context window. GPT 4.1 Mini has a 1,047.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT 4.1 Mini stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.