tokevenClaudevsGPT
Claude Opus 4.6 vs o3
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Opus 4.6
Flagshipo3
Mid-tierInput $/MTok
$5.00
$2.00
Output $/MTok
$25.00
$8.00
Cache discount
90% off
75% off
Context
1,000K
200K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
Claude Opus 4.6
o3
Guidance
When to use Claude Opus 4.6 vs o3
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when...
- -You need a larger context window (1,000K vs 200K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose o3 when...
- -Cost matters: 60% cheaper on input tokens
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Opus 4.6
o3
100K tokens
$1.10
$0.38Cheaper
1M tokens
$11.00
$3.80Cheaper
10M tokens
$110.00
$38.00Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use Claude Opus 4.6 instead of o3?
Claude Opus 4.6 and o3 perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is o3 cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6?
Yes. o3 input costs $2.00/MTok vs $5.00/MTok for Claude Opus 4.6, saving 60% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and o3?
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000K token context window. o3 has a 200K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Opus 4.6 and o3 stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.