tokevenClaudevsGPT
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT 5.6 Terra
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Haiku 5.5
Fast / BudgetGPT 5.6 Terra
Mid-tierInput $/MTok
$0.10
$2.00
Output $/MTok
$0.50
$12.00
Cache discount
90% off
90% off
Context
1M
922K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
64
Code Review
0
vs
84
Summarization
0
vs
64
Q&A
0
vs
92
Extraction
0
vs
75
Reasoning
0
vs
91
Classification
0
vs
89
Creative Writing
0
vs
67
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT 5.6 Terra
Guidance
When to use Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT 5.6 Terra
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 when...
- -Cost matters: 95% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1M vs 922K)
Choose GPT 5.6 Terra when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT 5.6 Terra
100K tokens
$0.02Cheaper
$0.50
1M tokens
$1.10Cheaper
$8.20
10M tokens
$11.00Cheaper
$82.00
FAQ
When should I use Claude Haiku 5.5 instead of GPT 5.6 Terra?
Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT 5.6 Terra perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is GPT 5.6 Terra cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5?
GPT 5.6 Terra input costs $2.00/MTok, which is 1900% more than Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT 5.6 Terra?
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a 1M token context window. GPT 5.6 Terra has a 922K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT 5.6 Terra stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.