tokevenClaudevsGPT
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT 4.1 Nano
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Haiku 5.5
Fast / BudgetGPT 4.1 Nano
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$0.10
$0.10
Output $/MTok
$0.50
$0.40
Cache discount
90% off
75% off
Context
1M
1.0M
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT 4.1 Nano
Guidance
When to use Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT 4.1 Nano
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose GPT 4.1 Nano when...
- -You need a larger context window (1.0M vs 1M)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT 4.1 Nano
100K tokens
$0.02
$0.02Cheaper
1M tokens
$1.10
$0.19Cheaper
10M tokens
$11.00
$1.90Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use Claude Haiku 5.5 instead of GPT 4.1 Nano?
Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT 4.1 Nano perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is GPT 4.1 Nano cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5?
Both models have the same input pricing at $0.10/MTok. Compare output pricing: $0.50 vs $0.40/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT 4.1 Nano?
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a 1M token context window. GPT 4.1 Nano has a 1.0M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT 4.1 Nano stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.