ClaudevsGPT

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.

Pricing

Side-by-side pricing

Claude Haiku 5.5

Fast / Budget

GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)

Fast / Budget
Input $/MTok
$0.10
$0.50
Output $/MTok
$0.50
$1.50
Cache discount
90% off
0% off
Context
1M
16K

Quality

Task confidence comparison

Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)

Guidance

When to use Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 when...

  • -Cost matters: 80% cheaper on input tokens
  • -You need a larger context window (1M vs 16K)

Choose GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) when...

  • Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.

At scale

Cost at scale

Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)
100K tokens
$0.02Cheaper
$0.08
1M tokens
$1.10
$0.80Cheaper
10M tokens
$11.00
$8.00Cheaper

FAQ

When should I use Claude Haiku 5.5 instead of GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.

Is GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5?

GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) input costs $0.50/MTok, which is 400% more than Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10/MTok.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125)?

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a 1M token context window. GPT 3.5 Turbo (0125) has a 16K token context window.

Track your real costs

Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.