ClaudevsGPT

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Luna

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.

Pricing

Side-by-side pricing

Claude Fable 5.1

Flagship

GPT 5.6 Luna

Fast / Budget
Input $/MTok
$10.00
$0.20
Output $/MTok
$50.00
$1.20
Cache discount
98% off
90% off
Context
1M
922K

Quality

Task confidence comparison

Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
74
vs
62
Code Review
0
vs
68
Summarization
71
vs
57
Q&A
0
vs
85
Extraction
75
vs
74
Reasoning
92
vs
86
Classification
0
vs
91
Creative Writing
78
vs
69
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT 5.6 Luna

Guidance

When to use Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Luna

Choose Claude Fable 5.1 when...

  • -You need strong reasoning (confidence 92 vs 86)
  • -You need strong creative writing (confidence 78 vs 69)
  • -You need strong extraction (confidence 75 vs 74)
  • -You need strong code generation (confidence 74 vs 62)
  • -You need a larger context window (1M vs 922K)

Choose GPT 5.6 Luna when...

  • -Cost matters: 98% cheaper on input tokens

At scale

Cost at scale

Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT 5.6 Luna
100K tokens
$2.20
$0.05Cheaper
1M tokens
$22.00
$0.82Cheaper
10M tokens
$220.00
$8.20Cheaper

FAQ

When should I use Claude Fable 5.1 instead of GPT 5.6 Luna?

Claude Fable 5.1 outperforms GPT 5.6 Luna for Code Generation, Summarization, Extraction. It costs $10.00/$50.00 per million tokens (input/output).

Is GPT 5.6 Luna cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1?

Yes. GPT 5.6 Luna input costs $0.20/MTok vs $10.00/MTok for Claude Fable 5.1, saving 98% on input.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT 5.6 Luna?

Claude Fable 5.1 has a 1M token context window. GPT 5.6 Luna has a 922K token context window.

Track your real costs

Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.