tokevenMoonshot (Kimi)vsMiniMax
Kimi K2 vs MiniMax M3
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Kimi K2
Mid-tierMiniMax M3
FlagshipInput $/MTok
$0.95
$0.30
Output $/MTok
$4.00
$1.20
Cache discount
83% off
80% off
Context
256K
1M
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
Kimi K2
MiniMax M3
Guidance
When to use Kimi K2 vs MiniMax M3
Choose Kimi K2 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose MiniMax M3 when...
- -Cost matters: 68% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1M vs 256K)
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Kimi K2
MiniMax M3
100K tokens
$0.19
$0.06Cheaper
1M tokens
$1.86
$1.14Cheaper
10M tokens
$18.65
$11.40Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use Kimi K2 instead of MiniMax M3?
Kimi K2 and MiniMax M3 perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is MiniMax M3 cheaper than Kimi K2?
Yes. MiniMax M3 input costs $0.30/MTok vs $0.95/MTok for Kimi K2, saving 68% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2 and MiniMax M3?
Kimi K2 has a 256K token context window. MiniMax M3 has a 1M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Kimi K2 and MiniMax M3 stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.