tokevenDeepSeekvsMoonshot (Kimi)
DeepSeek R1 vs Kimi K2
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
DeepSeek R1
Mid-tierKimi K2
Mid-tierInput $/MTok
$0.55
$0.95
Output $/MTok
$2.19
$4.00
Cache discount
75% off
83% off
Context
128K
256K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
DeepSeek R1
Kimi K2
Guidance
When to use DeepSeek R1 vs Kimi K2
Choose DeepSeek R1 when...
- -Cost matters: 42% cheaper on input tokens
Choose Kimi K2 when...
- -You need a larger context window (256K vs 128K)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
DeepSeek R1
Kimi K2
100K tokens
$0.10Cheaper
$0.19
1M tokens
$1.04Cheaper
$1.86
10M tokens
$10.42Cheaper
$18.65
FAQ
When should I use DeepSeek R1 instead of Kimi K2?
DeepSeek R1 and Kimi K2 perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Kimi K2 cheaper than DeepSeek R1?
Kimi K2 input costs $0.95/MTok, which is 73% more than DeepSeek R1 at $0.55/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 and Kimi K2?
DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window. Kimi K2 has a 256K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How DeepSeek R1 and Kimi K2 stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.