tokevenClaudevsGemini
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Opus 4.6
FlagshipGemini 2.5 Pro
Mid-tierInput $/MTok
$5.00
$1.25
Output $/MTok
$25.00
$10.00
Cache discount
90% off
90% off
Context
1,000K
1,048.576K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
Claude Opus 4.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Guidance
When to use Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when...
- -Cost matters: 75% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,048.576K vs 1,000K)
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Opus 4.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
100K tokens
$1.10
$0.39Cheaper
1M tokens
$11.00
$6.25Cheaper
10M tokens
$110.00
$62.50Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use Claude Opus 4.6 instead of Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6?
Yes. Gemini 2.5 Pro input costs $1.25/MTok vs $5.00/MTok for Claude Opus 4.6, saving 75% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000K token context window. Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,048.576K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.