tokevenClaude Opus 4.5 vs Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Opus 4.5
FlagshipGrok 4.20 Non-Reasoning
Mid-tierQuality
Task confidence comparison
Guidance
When to use Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
Choose Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning when...
- -Cost matters: 75% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1,000K vs 200K)
At scale
Cost at scale
FAQ
When should I use Claude Opus 4.5 instead of Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning?
Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5?
Yes. Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning input costs $1.25/MTok vs $5.00/MTok for Claude Opus 4.5, saving 75% on input.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning?
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200K token context window. Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning has a 1,000K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.