tokevenClaudevsAlibaba (Qwen)
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Haiku 5.5
Fast / BudgetQwen 3.8 Max
FlagshipInput $/MTok
$0.10
$2.00
Output $/MTok
$0.50
$6.00
Cache discount
90% off
88% off
Context
1M
1M
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
Claude Haiku 5.5
Qwen 3.8 Max
Guidance
When to use Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 when...
- -Cost matters: 95% cheaper on input tokens
Choose Qwen 3.8 Max when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Qwen 3.8 Max
100K tokens
$0.02Cheaper
$0.32
1M tokens
$1.10Cheaper
$3.20
10M tokens
$11.00Cheaper
$32.00
FAQ
When should I use Claude Haiku 5.5 instead of Qwen 3.8 Max?
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen 3.8 Max perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Qwen 3.8 Max cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5?
Qwen 3.8 Max input costs $2.00/MTok, which is 1900% more than Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen 3.8 Max?
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a 1M token context window. Qwen 3.8 Max has a 1M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen 3.8 Max stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.