tokevenClaudevsGemini
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Haiku 5.5
Fast / BudgetGemini 3.7 Flash
Fast / BudgetInput $/MTok
$0.10
$0.75
Output $/MTok
$0.50
$3.75
Cache discount
90% off
90% off
Context
1M
1.0M
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
67
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
79
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
72
Reasoning
0
vs
88
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
82
Claude Haiku 5.5
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Guidance
When to use Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 when...
- -Cost matters: 87% cheaper on input tokens
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash when...
- -You need a larger context window (1.0M vs 1M)
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Gemini 3.7 Flash
100K tokens
$0.02Cheaper
$0.16
1M tokens
$1.10Cheaper
$1.65
10M tokens
$11.00Cheaper
$16.50
FAQ
When should I use Claude Haiku 5.5 instead of Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5?
Gemini 3.7 Flash input costs $0.75/MTok, which is 650% more than Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a 1M token context window. Gemini 3.7 Flash has a 1.0M token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.