tokevenClaudevsDeepSeek
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek R1
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, task quality, and projected cost at higher scale.
Pricing
Side-by-side pricing
Claude Haiku 5.5
Fast / BudgetDeepSeek R1
Mid-tierInput $/MTok
$0.10
$0.55
Output $/MTok
$0.50
$2.19
Cache discount
90% off
75% off
Context
1M
128K
Quality
Task confidence comparison
Confidence score from zero to one hundred by task type, where higher is better.
Code Generation
0
vs
0
Code Review
0
vs
0
Summarization
0
vs
0
Q&A
0
vs
0
Extraction
0
vs
0
Reasoning
0
vs
0
Classification
0
vs
0
Creative Writing
0
vs
0
Claude Haiku 5.5
DeepSeek R1
Guidance
When to use Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek R1
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 when...
- -Cost matters: 82% cheaper on input tokens
- -You need a larger context window (1M vs 128K)
Choose DeepSeek R1 when...
- Similar performance; consider provider preference or ecosystem fit.
At scale
Cost at scale
Estimated cost assuming a seventy percent input and thirty percent output token split.
Claude Haiku 5.5
DeepSeek R1
100K tokens
$0.02Cheaper
$0.10
1M tokens
$1.10
$1.04Cheaper
10M tokens
$11.00
$10.42Cheaper
FAQ
When should I use Claude Haiku 5.5 instead of DeepSeek R1?
Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek R1 perform similarly across all tracked tasks. Pick based on pricing and provider preference.
Is DeepSeek R1 cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5?
DeepSeek R1 input costs $0.55/MTok, which is 450% more than Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10/MTok.
What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek R1?
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a 1M token context window. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window.
Go deeper on either model
Per-call cost calculators, provider lineups, and price history for both models on this page.
Other comparisons
How Claude Haiku 5.5 and DeepSeek R1 stack up against the rest of the field.
Track your real costs
Comparisons show estimated costs at list price. The dashboard reveals your real spend and savings.